“The horizontal ejection of structural steel members for hundreds of feet and the pulverization of concrete to flour-like powder, observed clearly in the collapses of the WTC towers, provide further evidence for the use of explosives.” Steven E. Jones,
Many volumes, documentary films, in depth studies, assessments, etc. have been produced which examine the official story of the events of 9/11 and expose it for what it is; a steaming pile of crap, riddled with inconsistencies, impossibilities, absurdities and outright lies. So much information exists debunking the Consortium’s “official” nonsense that any thinking person simply cannot ignore the damning evidence these massive researchers present.
The media dutifully presents the official story while denying a platform to anyone with alternative views and findings. The fact that so many still take anything the mainstream media says as anything but a joke, would be laughable to me if it weren’t so tragic. The media is the disinformation apparatus of this global network and they perform their job well, like the obedient little lap dogs that they are. The media’s job is to mold and influence public opinion and ultimately create a false reality by presenting events in a certain way. It works brilliantly, as so many people seem to take what is presented in the media as unmitigated fact, never questioning and never investigating for themselves.
For years now, myself and so many others have been branded a “nut,” “conspiracy theorist,” “wacko,” “unpatriotic,” and a whole host of other such absolute nonsense by ill-informed people that mostly display a marginal intelligence at best. This has of course been what seems to be a natural reaction of folks when they are presented with a view or ideas that are more informed than their own or views that are simply different. It’s relatively easy to gauge a person’s level of conditioning by simply observing how much they lash out at ideas that differ from their own. Moreover, those that feel that they are too smart to have been conditioned appear to be the most ill-informed and unenlightened. The fact of the matter is that we have all been conditioned to one degree or another and admitting that is not powerless, in fact the opposite is true. By not admitting to ourselves that we’ve been duped, we kid ourselves into believing that we have a good fix on things; on the global situation, on life or reality.
I’ve also observed that people will defend their position, almost violently at times, when presented with an idea that would force them to examine that position or to look within. Therefore, so many remain stuck, within a belief system or an ideology, or ideas that keep them caught within a certain point of view and that keeps their perspective from evolving. Anything outside of that box they’ve erected for themselves seems crazy or outlandish. More often than not, the opinions that people cling to so unwaveringly are not even their own. I think this quote sums it up perfectly:
“Americans don’t really think-they have opinions and feelings. Television creates the opinion and then validates it.” Hal Becker
The remark concerning television is spot on in my view. So many people that I meet and speak with have such strong opinions, particularly, political views that are entirely based upon what they’ve seen in the “news.” When they speak, it sounds like they are parroting the latest CNN or Fox news broadcast and they always seem to do it so unquestioningly, as if the mainstream media is the sole authority on world affairs. Why do so many seem to feel that corporations maintain a monopoly on the truth? Because let’s face it, all, and I do mean all mainstream print and broadcast media in the US is controlled by only six mega corporations.
So many otherwise intelligent people allow their entire worldview to be dictated by what they see, read or hear in the establishment, mainstream media. The media is not there to inform or educate; that is not its purpose. The media’s job is to shape and influence public opinion. Goodness help those whose research differs from the official version of events; they are at once attacked, ridiculed and branded as lunatics, simply for offering different information, even if the information they offer is true and provable! But such is the awesome power and deep level of conditioning. Primarily, omission, and distortion are the media’s tools to achieve this collective un-awareness, or dumbed-down population, if I may be blunt.
Regarding the events of September 11, 2001, and the events that have followed, the public has been hoodwinked to such a staggering degree, that it defies rational thought and truly exemplifies the deep level of conditioning present within most people. Even the most rudimentary investigation into the events of 9/11 would completely demolish the official explanation and expose it for the nonsense that it is. However, most people will not go there; it’s far too frightening. Most will never search beyond the news to find out things on their own. Only crazy people do that, right?
Meanwhile, a massive, global movement has arisen to get to the bottom of what really happened on 9/11. More and more people are coming forward with information that shatters the official explanation and not just researchers like me. Highly credible people have come forward offering data, testimony, eyewitness accounts and research that shows clearly that the public has not been told the truth concerning the most horrific attacks against America to date, including: pilots, firefighters, rescue workers, police, authors, former heads of state, flight school instructors, engineers, physics experts, and many others that show the official story to be nothing more than a fairy tale of enormous proportions.
Shortly after 9/11, Bush said: “let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September 11th.” Well, let’s take George’s advice, and not tolerate the outrageous conspiracy theories that the government and mass media offered the public in the aftermath of those terrible attacks. Let’s be brave and face the unanswered questions. Let us be patriotic and hold our [mis]leaders in check, indeed, it is our duty to do so. Let us step outside of our conditioning, if only for a moment, and examine the evidence with a critical eye, and an open mind.
The attacks perpetrated on New York and Washington DC were far more than a colossal intelligence failure, as many would have you believe. They were coldly calculated, vicious attacks that could have only been pulled off with help from within the highest levels of government, and compartmentalized intelligence agencies. The evidence that just keeps coming forward to support that claim is simply too overwhelming for any thinking person to ignore. The 9/11 truth movement is growing exponentially across the world; this is a global movement. And it is not a movement of lunatics and wackos, it is one made up of patriots, political leaders, and people concerned about losing their freedoms.
In this segment, I just wanted to raise a few pertinent points to show that we have not been told the whole story concerning 9/11 and to further reiterate the Hegelian Dialectic triad. Mountains of information are available to anyone who cares to look at it.
911 Anomalies and Unanswered Questions
The public has been told that on the morning of Sept 11, 2001, 19 hijackers simultaneously took control of four commercial jets and slammed them into their targets. Of the list of 19 hijackers published by the FBI, why are at least five of them (hijackers) still alive?1 And why has the FBI never amended the list?
When a commercial aircraft turns off its transponder, and deviates from its flight plan, it is FAA standard operating procedure to scramble fighter jets immediately. Why did fighters stand down on the morning of 9/11? Who has the authority to order a stand down, bypassing ordinary procedure?
NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) is the institution in charge of monitoring all airspace in the US and Canada. Located deep within the Cheyenne Mountains, in Colorado, NORAD possesses the most advanced tracking technology on the planet. Why did NORAD stand down when four airliners deviated from their intended flight path? Again, who ordered no military action, in spite of standard operating procedure?
How was a hijacked aircraft able to penetrate the most protected airspace and attack the most fortified military installation in the world, at the Pentagon?
Why were there drills being conducted (Operation Vigilant Guardian among others) of hijacked aircraft being rammed into the exact targets that were hit on the very same morning of Sept. 11?2 The Associated Press version even reported on this.3
The maximum burning temperature of any hydrocarbon fire is 1,700 degrees Fahrenheit. Steel used in support columns of buildings does not even begin to reach its melting point until 2,720 degrees Fahrenheit. Why then, did three buildings on 9/11 collapse due to fire? How does fuel burn at 1,020 degrees hotter than it normally would?
Building seven-which was the furthest away from the towers, and which was not hit by any aircraft, and very little debris-collapsed at about 5:30 PM on 9/11. What caused the building to collapse? Why has the 9/11 Commission ignored this pertinent fact? Building 7 is the greatest smoking gun of the whole event. The government and 9/11 commission have still not offered a logical explanation as to why this building collapsed. In fact, the 9/11 commission failed to even mention building 7 in their official whitewash, er, report.
There were a few, very small, contained fires within building seven. The sprinkler systems in the building should have easily extinguished the fires. What caused the fires in building 7? Why has the Commission not told us what started the fires?
Larry Silverstein, the lease holder for buildings 1, 2, and 7, said on a PBS documentary called America Rebuilds, that he and the NYC fire dept. made the decision to “pull” building seven. “Pull” is engineering jargon for demolish with explosives. It takes weeks of planning to plant the necessary explosives in a building to bring it down properly. How did the engineering crews set the explosives in building seven, amidst all of the chaos? Why have the media and the 9/11 Commission refused to address this?4
Is it just coincidence that only the buildings for which Silverstein (who stood to gain billions of dollars) held the leases came down on 9/11? Silverstein invested $ 150 million to purchase the WTC complex, and raked in $ 7 billion after the attack. Quite a return wouldn’t you say?
Securecom5 was the company in charge of security for the WTC. Is it coincidence that their contract was up on 9/11? Is it also merely coincidence that Marvin Bush, George W. Bush’s brother was head of security? Moreover, is it only coincidence that Securecom also were in charge of security at Dulles Airport?
Why did Columbia University’s seismographs show a 2.1 earthquake just prior to time that the south tower began collapsing and a 2.3 seismic spike prior to the time that the north tower began collapsing? Another coincidence?
Put options, are basically a bet that a particular stock will drop. Why, in just days before 9/11, were enormous put options (up to and exceeding ten times the daily average) placed on United and American airlines stocks? Why, when an investigation led to the highest levels within the CIA, was the investigation halted?6 Why did the SEC (Security Exchange Commission) destroy the records?
Why did the FBI claim that no black box transponders were found amidst the WTC rubble, while rescue workers claimed to have found three of them?7
The FBI claimed that they found a passport of one of the hijackers amongst the rubble of the WTC.8 I posed this question in: The Hegelian Dialectic Revisited: http://dougmichaeltruth.wordpress.com/2014/08/31/the-hegelian-dialectic-revisited/ but it bears repeating: how does a piece of paper survive an explosion of fuel and metal? How does a piece of paper survive temperatures so hot, that they melt steel frame support beams? The FBI also claims that a hijacker’s passport was found amidst the rubble of the flight 93 crash in Pennsylvania. What are the odds of finding two separate passports amidst two separate crash sites? What are the odds that both passports would survive such explosions and be recognizable? Are Americans supposed to be that stupid, to believe such nonsense? Apparently so. By the way, the passport allegedly found amidst the flight 93 rubble, belongs to a person named Ziad Jarrah, who is still alive!9
Condoleezza Rice, who served as secretary of State under G.W. Bush, claimed that shortly after 9/11, the government would offer indisputable proof that Osama Bin Laden was responsible for the attacks. Why are we still waiting for it?
How many among the general public are aware that Osama and the Taliban were trained, funded and installed into power by the CIA? The Taliban were trained to fight against the Soviets who invaded Afghanistan during the mid 1980s. Why has the mainstream media not acknowledged this fact?
Why was George Bush Senior meeting with Osama’s brother Shafig bin Laden at the Ritz-Carlton hotel Washington on the morning of 9/11?10
How many of the general public are aware that the Bush and Bin Laden families have enormous, long-standing connections through one of the world’s largest defense contractors known as the Carlyle Group?11
On the morning of Sept. 12, 2001, why were members of the Bin Laden family allowed to leave the country on airplanes, when all other flights were grounded?
How was the late researcher, William Cooper, in June of 2001, able to predict that a major event would occur and that Bin Laden would be the scapegoat?12
William Rodriguez was a maintenance employee working in one of the towers on the morning of 9/11. He has been recognized by the city of NY and the govt. for his heroic efforts to rescue people from the towers. Why has the media and 9/11 Commission ignored his testimony that he heard and felt explosions in the basement of the north tower? 14 people have backed his testimony and yet the media ignores it. Why?13
Rodriguez pulled a badly burned man from the basement. How does a jet that hits the 90th floor, burn a man in the basement?
Former New York City Mayor, Rudolph Giuliani claimed that he received prior warning that the towers were going to collapse. Who told him? Why didn’t the firefighters and rescue workers get the same warning? Who could have known that the buildings would collapse? abc News reported on this.14
Why was the rubble from the WTC carted away and not allowed to be examined by experts until recently?
Why did the Bush administration block independent investigations into the 9/11 attacks?
Why has the media ignored the fact that a Brigham Young University physics professor by the name of Steven Jones has found traces of thermate on some of the structural steel residue from the WTC? Thermate is used in controlled demolition.15
Why was the British owned company, Controlled Demolition hired to remove the rubble from both the WTC and the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City without it being investigated by experts? The ironic thing is that the name of the company actually tells what happened at the World Trade Center.16 Often times the truth hides in plain sight.
Bush claimed that he saw the first plane strike the tower on the morning of 9/11 on a television monitor, before entering the classroom at Booker Elementary school in Florida. How is this possible, when no such footage had been aired?
Why did the Bush administration order investigations into Bin Laden to cease, soon after Bush took office?17
How come the Windsor building, in Madrid, Spain, which burned for over 20 hours straight, did not suffer a similar fate as the WTC towers and building 7, even though its structural steel was weaker than that of the towers? I guess steel in Spain behaves differently. On April 3, 2013, the tallest building in Chechnya, the Grozny City skyscraper, a 40-story building, was engulfed in a raging inferno for about 29 hours. The entire building was destroyed but did not collapse. So how does a 110-story skyscraper collapse into its own footprint in under an hour, when most of the fuel exploded outside of the building? I think the answer is obvious; fire cannot melt steel.
Why was the Patriot Act, a reprehensible piece of legislation that destroys civil liberties, railroaded through Congress without the signatories even being allowed to read it, and solely as a result of the attacks?
Why was San Francisco mayor, Willie Brown as well as other public officials warned on Sept. 10, 2001 not to fly on 9/11?18
If the fires were so bad, that they somehow melted steel in three buildings, then why did NYC firefighters report prior to the first collapse, that the fires were minimal, and under control? Recordings exist that confirm this.19
Why has the media and 9/11 Commission ignored the initial report of a NYC fire chief, who reported bombs in both the towers, and on the planes? NBC reported on this.20
[NOTE: As mentioned in The Hegelian Dialectic Revisited, the same thing happened when the Oklahoma City bombing occurred on April 19, 1995. Initial mainstream media broadcasts reported eyewitnesses hearing multiple explosions and seeing bomb squad personnel remove unexploded devices from the Murrah building. Shortly thereafter, reports like these disappeared because they conflicted with the official story. I have the original abc news clips from the morning of 9/11. Peter Jennings claimed that the WTC collapses resembled a controlled demolition. After 9/11, no other anchor dared to make claims like that. The official version of events had become solidified, and the media repeated it unquestioningly. Journalism? Fair and balanced reporting? You must be fucking joking!]
On the weekend of 9/8, 9/9 2001, why was there a “power down” condition in the south tower for 36 hours, from the 50th floor and above? No power means no surveillance cameras, and no security locks. Just another coincidence I’m sure. Check this source for multiple news clips suggesting that explosives were used in the towers.21
Why was credible witness testimony of engineers, as reported in Chief Engineer Magazine ignored by the media and Commission?22
Why was a construction worker’s testimony of an explosion in the basement ignored by the media and Commission? So, an aircraft that hits the upper floors causes the wall in the subbasement to blow out?23
There is a film clip of building 7 in which one can easily see charges going off in succession in the upper right hand corner of the building. Why has this clip not been broadcast on Fox or CNN or any mainstream media outlet for that matter?
Less than an hour before the WTC attacks, Donald Rumsfeld, former secretary of Defense under G.W. Bush, told a congressional delegation that a “shocking” event would occur soon. How did he know? Prior knowledge? No, of course not, that’s crazy talk!
The Department of Justice (DoJ) published a manual in 2000 titled: Managing Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents: an Executive Level Program for Sheriffs. The cover of the manual depicts one of the twin towers in crosshairs. The Consortium often cryptically leaves clues as to what they are going to do.
The people were told that a 757 passenger, jet aircraft hit the Pentagon. Why was there no wreckage from the crash? No luggage? No remains? Why was the lawn left unscathed? When questions arose, the media claimed that the aircraft disintegrated! How does a 220,000 pound aircraft just disintegrate?
Why was there no response from Edward’s Air base which is just down the road from the Pentagon? The Pentagon was not even hit until an hour-and-twenty minutes after the attacks began. Why weren’t fighter jets patrolling the Nation’s capitol?
We were told that flight 93, which crashed in PA. Was taken over by passengers and forced to the ground. Why then, was debris scattered over a seven mile trail? Was flight 93 shot down?
Why did the FBI confiscate surveillance footage from a gas station adjacent to the Pentagon and from several other businesses? This footage has never been released to the public? Why?
Why did Christine Todd Whitman, head of the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) at the time, claim that the air around ground zero was completely safe?25 Rescue workers and cleanup crews have been getting sick in droves due to the EPA’s claims that the air was safe at ground zero. This is how we allow our heroes to be treated?
The towers were designed to withstand hits by aircraft. 47 steel core columns existed within each of the towers. How could the south tower fall after burning for less than one hour? How could the north tower fall after burning for less than two hours? Most of the fuel burned up upon impact so again, how do fires melt steel?
Cleanup crews reported molten metal being present within the wreckage of the towers weeks after the disaster. How could jet fuel, most of which exploded outside of the towers, have caused molten pools of metal in the rubble?26
The BBC reported that Building 7 (Salomon Bros. Building) had collapsed over 20 minutes before the building actually came down. In a video clip that surfaced in 2007, one can clearly see the building still standing behind the reporter as she’s reporting the collapse and official time stamps confirm the BBC’s reporting of this event almost a half-hour before the building collapsed. When confronted, the BBC claimed to have lost the 9/11 tapes. How convenient. I watched this unfold on live TV that day. It was around 5:20 PM that the building came down and yet the BBC reported the collapse at 4:54 PM. Are BBC reporters clairvoyant? Do they possess magic, crystal balls that can see into the future? Who knew the building would collapse and why did the BBC jump the gun so to speak? Many first responders are on record stating the building was coming down before it actually did. Is this why the commission simply ignored that building 7 even existed? Sourced is a clip of the official news report in which you can see the building to the left of the reporter’s head as she reports that the building has collapsed.27 Who had foreknowledge of the collapse?
In 1997, a neoconservative think-tank group called the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was created. The group included members of the Bush administration and other neocons including, Paul Wolfowitz (president of the World bank), Richard Perle (PNAC founder), John Bolton (US ambassador to the UN), Richard Armitage (Deputy Secretary of State), Dick Cheney (VP under G.W. Bush), Donald Rumsfeld (secretary of defense under Bush), Jeb Bush (governor of Florida and brother to G.W), William Kristol (PNAC founder and former chief of staff to Dan Quayle during the first Bush administration), and many others. Interesting but not surprising, of the PNAC’s 25 signatories to their mission statement, 17 are CFR members.
In September of 2000, a year before the 9/11 attacks, the PNAC published a document titled: Rebuilding America‘s Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources for a New Century. The document outlines the plan to massively expand US military presence in the Middle East, Southeast Asia and Europe. The globalist neocons had plans to destabilize Iraq for years before the 9/11 attacks occurred. From the PNAC documents we read:
“While the unresolved conflict in Iraq provides the immediate justification [for expanded US military presence], the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein”
“Over the long term, Iran may well prove as large a threat to US interests in the Gulf as Iraq has. And even should US-Iranian relations improve; retaining forward-based forces in the region would still be an essential element in US security strategy given the longstanding American interests in the region.”
Shortly after the attacks, the Bush administration promoted their “Axis of Evil” campaign, demonizing Iraq, Iran and North Korea and dutifully following the script of the PNAC. The “War on Terror” was born which is really a war on freedom conducted by the most ruthless, sycophantic henchmen the Consortium has to offer.
The PNAC documents basically outline a plan for US dominance and geopolitical restructuring in areas that are strategically significant and abundant in natural resources, particularly, oil. The plan was always to completely dominate Iraq, which was already massively destabilized due to the 13 years of economic sanctions placed on the country following the first gulf war. In the run up to the second Iraq war, which was launched in 2003, the Bush administration claimed that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction which he was intent upon using against his neighbors. That was a lie. The Bush administration was shown to have lied time and again but we are supposed to believe these people when they tell us what happened on 9/11 and what should happen as a result? The most chilling part of the PNAC documents spells out the mentality of these sick people and the hidden networks that pull their puppet strings. From section V of the documents, titled “Creating Tomorrow’s Dominant Force,” we read:
“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event-like a new Pearl Harbor.”
For “new Pearl Harbor,” see 9/11, 2001. The attacks of Sept. 11th gave the Bush administration the opportunity to launch an open-ended war, to remove basic civil liberties, massively increase the surveillance society and to create a collective climate of fear, which is what the Consortium wants most. Basic freedoms are destroyed under the guise of keeping the people safe. A totalitarian police state has unfolded and it is so blatantly obvious that one would need to be asleep or under a spell as it were, to not see it. Well, that is exactly the case and we will come to that in a future essay.
The 9/11 attacks opened the door for endless wars, the removal of due process of law, indefinite detentions with no trial or due process, the erection of a police state surveillance grid, the removal of Posse Comitatus (limits federal involvement in domestic law enforcement), economic devastation, and on the list goes. The draconian policies have continued under the Obama administration as with the passage of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which allows for American civilians to be detained indefinitely, without trial or due process, merely on suspicion. Who decides if a person is “suspicious,” or an “enemy combatant?” The president does.
Following the attacks, the Bush administration passed the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act which stands for: Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. The act which passed solely as a result of 9/11 allowed for the NSA (national Security Agency) to spy on American people through warrantless wiretaps, allowed for foreign nationals to be detained without trial or due process, and calls for the creation of secret military tribunals for suspected enemy combatants. Defending the act, Alberto Gonzales US Attorney General under Bush claimed:
“President Washington, President Lincoln, President Wilson, President Roosevelt have all authorized electronic surveillance on a far broader scale.”
Interesting, considering that the technology to do so did not exist when those presidents held office. I wonder how many people listened to that ridiculous statement and just nodded their heads in blind acceptance. The Patriot Act also contains provisions to allow for the monitoring of bank accounts, destroy lawyer/client confidentiality, search financial records without a court order and even check a person’s library records. This act was rammed through congress just over a month after 9/11 and the signatories weren’t even allowed to read the documents!
On September 10th 2001, Donald Rumsfeld (BG, TC) announced that $2.3 trillion had gone missing from the Pentagon. Is it simply another coincidence that the budget accounting office at the Pentagon, that would have held the records, just so happened to be the area of the building that was targeted?
In 1982, a card game went on the market called, Illuminati. The theme of the game is to control the world through the competition of secret societies using sinister means, including germ warfare and false flag bombings. Two of the cards in the game depict the Pentagon and the Twin Towers on fire.
An album by alternative hip-hop artists called the Coup, which was scheduled to be released in early September, 2001, depicted band members detonating an explosion in the Twin Towers. Is this mere coincidence or is it a cryptic message by the Consortium which controls the entertainment industry?
Take a moment and listen:
This essay barely scratches the surface on all of the anomalies of the 9/11 event. We have been told lie upon lie through the compliant mainstream media, which has parroted the official version of events unquestioningly. I cannot even pretend to know what really happened on that tragic day, but I do know this: the official version is a steaming pile of crap from beginning to end. As always, I would suggest that people do their own homework and look to sources outside of the mainstream propaganda machine. There is so much information in existence that shows beyond the shadow of doubt that the official story is an utter lie. 9/11 was the catalyst to launch an open-ended war and to begin the takeover of resource-rich lands in the Middle East, as well as to launch a police state and destroy basic human rights here in America.
Now we have ISIS, the paramilitary organization brought to you by the very forces that are waging war with this terrorist group. This is how it is done; The Consortium creates its own enemy so that it can justify going to war. Expect more false flag operations in the coming days. The only way out of this mess is for each individual to begin to see the world for what it is and to embrace their own inner darkness and face their fears, thereby facilitating their own conscious evolution. Despite all of the horrors, this is truly an amazing time to be alive and experiencing in the here and now. The solutions lie within!