From the moment of birth human beings are controlled under the current established paradigms, and this begins on the physical level through vaccinations. We’ve been taught to believe that vaccines are good for us; that they help to strengthen the immune system and ward off illness, yet the opposite is true, as massive amounts of data and unbiased, scientific research has shown. In fact, a recent report published by the Human and Experimental Toxicology Journal has shown a direct link between vaccines and infant mortality rates in the developed countries. On the one hand, vaccinations generate billions in profits for the pharmaceutical corporations, and on the other, they destroy the immune system as opposed to strengthening it.
A child’s immune system isn’t even fully active until around the age of four, so the barrage of vaccinations-usually around 25 by the age of two- given to newborns and toddlers is basically pointless. Vaccines are laden with toxic poisons such as: Thimerosol, a derivative of mercury; aluminum, a proven neurotoxin; formaldehyde (linked to Asthma); and also DNA and RNA from animals such as monkeys and from chick embryos. Vaccines also contain live viruses, which are treated with toxic chemicals, radiation, and/or heat, in order to sterilize them.
One potentially dangerous concoction given to infants is the Hepatitis B vaccine, which has been linked to causing autism and neurotoxicity. The manufacturer of the Hepatitis B vaccine is a company called Merck, which has recently been found liable in the death of a man who died as a result of taking their drug Vioxx. Thousands of other cases have been filed against Merck due to adverse reactions to their poisonous “medications.”
The CDC (Center for Disease Control) claims that Hepatitis B is a disease that primarily affects sexually promiscuous people, gays, and intravenous drug users. So why do infants need it? If there’s a fear that the child will grow up to be sexually promiscuous, or to use IV drugs, why not wait until the child has developed a stronger immune system? That wouldn’t do, because then poison peddlers like Merck would stand to lose billions of dollars. Apparently, Merck willfully concealed information concerning the health risks associated with Vioxx to protect its $2.5 billion in annual profits from the drug. What a surprise. Approximately 4,200 suits have been filed against Merck, and in some cases, evidence suggests Vioxx consumption has been linked to causing heart attacks and strokes.
Recently, senior scientist with the CDC, William Thompson, has stepped forward to publicly admit that the MMR (Measles Mumps Rubella) vaccine- another lovely concoction brought to you by Merck-is linked to causing Autism in children and that the CDC committed fraud and covered up this fact. He admitted that there is a 340% increase of Autism in boys receiving the MMR vaccine.
Recently, Merck lobbied to have state legislatures force their latest vaccine on the public. The Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a series of 100 different strains of viruses, spread through sex, and that can lead to cervical Cancer, so says the CDC. The billions of dollars that a company such as Merck generates can easily “influence” lawmakers to push for a mandatory vaccination campaign, and Texas governor, Rick Perry has done so by executive order on behalf of Merck. Documents show that Merck donated $5,000 to Perry, and an additional $5,000 to eight state lawmakers. Perry was recently indicted on charges of veto fraud.
This vaccine, called Gardasil targets young girls and women, from the ages of 11-26 to “protect” them from possible, future Cancer of the cervix. The HPV vaccine is administered in a three shot regiment, which costs around $360.00. I’m sure the push for mandatory HPV vaccines is all about protecting girls, and has nothing to do with generating billions of dollars in profits. Fortunately, the executive order to force the HPV vaccine on young women was rescinded in Texas by a house committee, after enormous pressure from human rights lobbyists; however, the states of Virginia and Kentucky have recently made the shots mandatory. Merck was campaigning to make the HPV shots compulsory and some 20 states are considering it.
The HPV vaccines have already reportedly caused damage in young girls, including autoimmune diseases. In fact, to date, over 36,000 officially reported adverse effects have been filed! Gardasil was apparently only tested on a few hundred girls, aged 11-12. The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) mandated Merck to follow up on a sufficient number of children aged 11-12, to determine the vaccine’s safety! The study was not even be completed until 2009, even though the vaccine was pushed long before that! What? I’ll put this as simply as possible: Merck, with the approval of the FDA and CDC, is experimenting on young girls, and lobbying state legislatures to make the experimental shots mandatory.
A virus that is said to cause Cancer is injected directly into the bloodstream to prevent possible, future outbreak from a sexually transmitted disease. What ever happened to teaching children responsibility? Why not mandate Pap Smears* instead of largely untested vaccines? That wouldn’t do; there are too many billions to be made. Studies on cost effectiveness have shown that Merck’s vaccine could be offered at a reasonable price, partly by reducing the need for frequent Pap Smears. Of course the studies were mostly funded by Merck, and GlaxoSmithKline, another pharmaceutical giant that also manufactures a cervical Cancer vaccine called Cervarix. The FDA considered the Gardasil vaccine safe, even though the study was not yet complete at the time the vaccine was released to the public. I wonder how many parents would be willing to have their daughters used as guinea pigs in vaccine experiments. Analysts predicted that Gardasil profits could reach $2 billion annually by 2010 and they seem to be right on target. Martha Nolan, the vice president of The Society for Women’s Health Research stated at an FDA hearing that with the approval of Gardasil, the FDA had “the opportunity to eradicate this terrible disease.” 
I suppose the fact that Nolan’s organization receives funding from Merck is just a coincidence. A group of state legislatures called Women in Government began the campaign to convince state legislatures and lawmakers to mandate the Gardasil vaccine. Women in Government also receives funding from Merck, which I’m quite sure is also just coincidental. They will not even disclose how much money they receive from the pharmaceutical giant. In response to the skepticism of doctors, concerning the efficacy of Gardasil, a Merck employee called Dr. Barr stated:
“Gardasil’s true efficacy will become more apparent with time, particularly in the group that includes women with a pre-existing infection.
In other words, just trust us. How the hell can they tell us that the efficacy of the vaccine will become more apparent? Do Merck doctors have crystal balls that can see into the future? Do the shots contain magical pixie dust that can nullify any negative side effects? Again, the young women being vaccinated now are the experiment.
Vaccinations for a particular disease actually contain a portion of that disease. Regarding Merck’s HPV vaccine, this means that the vaccine actually contains the Cancer causing HPV virus. Toxic bacterium or live viruses are used in the production of vaccines. In the production of live virus vaccines, the vaccine must be weakened for use in humans. This is done by a process called serial passage, which means that the serum is passed through animal tissue to weaken it. The weakened germ must then be disinfected, strengthened and stabilized, and this is done using drugs, antibiotics and disinfectants, i.e. mercury, formaldehyde etc. During the process of serial passage, animal DNA and RNA can be transferred from one host to another, and because of direct injection into the body, it can actually alter our DNA. Altering or weakening human DNA is one of the main agendas behind the vaccine campaigns, and it is begun when children are at their most vulnerable. Undetected animal viruses can actually infect vaccines and cause the very condition that the inoculation is supposed to protect against. For instance, in England in 1871-1872, roughly 98% of the population between ages 2-50, were vaccinated against Smallpox, and yet 45,000 people died from Smallpox. At the same time, in Germany, with a vaccination rate of 96%, roughly 125,000 deaths occurred from Smallpox!
Under the guise of protecting against disease, newborn infants are injected with an array of toxic chemicals and viruses. The number of recommended vaccines has increased exponentially over the last several years as well, as has the profits of the vaccine manufacturers. By the time a child reaches the age of one, he/she will have received around 25 shots. We are taught to believe that by injecting poisons into our children, that we are protecting them, and so few ever bother to question. Question a doctor? Are you nuts? How many people will actually take the time to find out what the ingredients of vaccinations are or how they are made? There’s no need for that; we have experts to tell us what to think and believe. Interestingly, most of the scientific research “proving” that vaccines are safe and effective is provided by the vaccine manufacturers themselves. But I’m sure that if they found their concoctions to cause damage, they’d tell us. Sure, and I can stand on my head and regurgitate hundred-dollar bills.
It’s profits before people and it’s always been that way. The pharmaceutical industry is not so much interested in health; it’s purpose is to fill the coffers and line the pockets of the ultra-rich, all while killing you off slowly.
In 1940, in Germany, mandatory vaccinations for Diphtheria were carried out, and by 1945, Diphtheria cases skyrocketed from 40,000 to 250,000. There are numerous examples of vaccines causing the very condition they are supposed to prevent. Thimerosol, which has been used for decades as an additive in vaccines, has been shown to contain ethyl mercury, which has been proven to accumulate in the brain, and causes neurotoxicity. Ethyl mercury converts to inorganic mercury and is demonstrably a developmental toxin. Mercury has been linked to causing autism in children as well as other neurological disorders including impairment of motor functioning. The Denmark medical establishment banned the use of Thimerosol in vaccines and saw a two-thirds decline in autism rates. Thimerosol crosses the blood/brain barrier, concentrates in tissue, causes mental retardation and destroys down to the DNA level. In 1982, an FDA panel concluded that:
“Thimerosol is not generally recognized as safe and effective.”
It makes sense then, that Thimerosol has continued to be used in vaccines and still is. The use of Thimerosol is slowly being phased out, due to the discovery of its toxicity but it is still in use in many vaccines. As an interesting aside: the top financial donors to the American Academy of Pediatrics just so happen to be pharmaceutical companies. What a coincidence. Another amazing coincidence: 85% of physicians that write clinical practice guidelines have contracts with drug companies. Why are the words “conflict of interest” coming to mind?
It’s also been shown that mercury interferes with reproduction, (it destroys cilia in the Fallopian tubes) ahh, now we’re getting closer to one of the real reasons for massive vaccination campaigns, especially in third world countries. The use of aluminum as an additive in vaccines makes mercury even more deadly. Both are highly toxic to the human body and this is indisputable.
The levels of mercury are measured in parts-per-billion (ppb). Water is considered contaminated at 2 ppb and fish at 730-1,450 ppb. Many vaccines contain as much as 50,000 ppb of mercury! Some vaccines contain 129 times the FDA approved safe limit of mercury! How can it possibly do any good to inject such toxins directly into the bloodstream, especially in newborns?
Guylaine Lanctot, one of the many doctors that have courageously come forward with information on the ill effects of vaccines, states in her article Why Vaccinations Continue:
“Vaccination is expensive and represents a cost of one billion dollars annually. It therefore benefits the industry; most notably, the multinational manufacturers. One sells the vaccines. The other then provides the arsenal of medications to respond to the numerous complications that follow. Their profits increase while our expenses go through the roof, to the point where we have simply had it up to here and are ready to accept the unacceptable, such as socialized medicine in the United States, for example.”
I think that statement sums it up perfectly. The health care industry really ought to be called the sick care industry. There is no profit in the cure. The drug and vaccine manufacturers benefit enormously from sickness and disease. Ultimately however, it is about more than just obscene profits. It is about control, population management and reduction, mass experimentation and as disturbing as it is, ritualistic sacrifice. If that sounds fantastic, that’s because it is but that does not change the reality of the situation. This is the world you live in, whether or not you are aware of it.
Dr. Lanctot goes on to state:
“Vaccination stimulates the immune system, the body’s defense mechanism. Repeated vaccination exhausts the immune system. It gives a false sense of security and, in doing so; it opens the door wide to all kinds of illnesses. Notably, to those related to AIDS, which can only develop on ripe ground, where the immune system has been disturbed. It causes AIDS to explode. It ensures that the illness flourishes perpetually.”
In impoverished countries such as Zimbabwe, Swaziland, India and Botswana, where mass vaccination campaign are undertaken, is it merely coincidence that AIDS is at its highest? It’s no coincidence, and declassified government documents reveal an agenda going back decades, to covertly instigate population reduction programs. What better way, than to deliver diseases disguised as preventative medicine?
The Mercury derivative Thimerosol is trademarked by a company called Eli Lilly, which has heavy financial ties to the Bush family and members of the current administration at the time of this writing. Interestingly, the vice president of Eli Lilly is one of the executive council members of the Institute of Medicine. British and Japanese regulatory agencies, as well as the FDA issued warnings that Eli Lilly’s antipsychotic drug Zyprexa may be linked to Diabetes. In 2003, the same year that the FDA issued a warning concerning Zyprexa, the drug grossed $4.28 billion. In that same year, Eli Lilly’s second most lucrative drugs were anti diabetes medications, which grossed $2.51 billion. Just another coincidence, I’m sure. The Homeland Security Act, which passed in 2002, contains a provision which protects Eli Lilly and other big pharmaceutical corporations from lawsuits by those suing for damage caused by Thimerosol or other toxins. Isn’t that nice? Essentially this means that they can legally poison your children, cause them neurological damage, and not even be held accountable for it! G.W. Bush even appointed Eli Lilly’s CEO, Sidney Taurel to a seat on the Homeland Security Advisory Council.
The antidepressant drug Prozac is one of Eli Lilly’s drugs, which has come under scrutiny for being connected to causing side effects of violent outbreaks in people taking it. In 1991, an FDA panel consisting of nine members-five of which were connected to pharmaceutical companies (two of whom were working for Eli Lilly)-concluded that Prozac did not require a violence warning in order to be marketed. Eli Lilly has settled a number of violence claims out of court; in fact by the end of 1994, 150 Prozac lawsuits had been filed. As of 1992 there were 23,067 officially filed adverse side effects to Prozac reported. Of those officially filed reports there were 1,313 deaths reported, and 1,436 suicide attempts, and in 1992, Prozac had only been on the market for four years.
Prozac and other antidepressants change the physiology of the brain and can lead to mania, or violent outbreaks. People that suddenly stop taking these powerful drugs often react aggressively or fall into deep, often suicidal depression. These often harmful antidepressants have been distributed like candy in the US. Of course, most of the research showing the drugs to be safe was provided by the very companies that manufacture them but most doctors and patients will have no idea of this.
Good luck trying to warn your friends or loved ones about the dangers of these drugs, the connections to corrupted political leaders, or the lawsuits. The person or authority they give their power away to, the “expert,” the doctor or shrink has prescribed the drugs, so it’s OK. How dare you offer information that just may save their life! If you don’t have a degree from an accredited university or letters after your name, then what the hell do you know? I’ve received that completely ignorant attitude more times than I care to remember. On one occasion, someone I know asked me to research for him the potential side effects of Prozac because his shrink had recommended the drug. I provided him with numerous documents that clearly established what I’ve outlined here. Of course he ignored the information and took the drugs anyway. I find it curious that people will not even be bothered looking into the potential side effects of drugs that they are considering taking. This is just one example of the deep and comprehensive level of mind conditioning prevalent in so many. Of course antidepressants have been administered regularly to young children as well, and mindless parents simply accept the drugging of their kids on the say-so of some “expert.” Among the many adverse side effects linked to Prozac are:
- Abnormal dreaming
- Allergic reaction
- Flu symptoms
- Stomach/intestinal disorders
- Abnormal ejaculation
- Stoppage of menstrual flow
- Breast cysts
- Excessive bleeding
- Ovarian Disorders
So why is this harmful drug still on the market? Could one of the main reasons be the fact that in 2006 Eli Lilly posted 3rd quarter profits of $3.8 billion? Second quarter profits for 2014 were $4.9 billion. Children in preschool, as young as three have been prescribed Prozac and other antidepressants. What the hell does a three-year-old have to be depressed about? They cancelled Sponge Bob? He lost his blue crayon? How is depression diagnosed in a small child anyway? And what must the moron parents be thinking to put their toddlers on these heavy drugs such as Prozac? Oh that’s right, a psychologist said it’s OK so there’s no need to question or to think at all. Incidentally, the long term effects of Prozac are unknown, because it hasn’t been around that long. Young children are prescribed these heavy drugs for a condition called Selective Mutism, which basically means they’re shy.
The school shooting at Virginia Tech, on April 16th, 2007, left 33 dead including the shooter. It was almost immediately established that the shooter was treated for depression, which included the use of antidepressants. It has come to light that in most of these shootings and murder sprees, that the shooter was under treatment which involved some sort of antidepressant or anti-psychotic medication.
In 2005, a court in Montgomery County, Virginia, ruled that the Va. Tech shooter, Seung-Hui Cho posed “an imminent danger to self or others.” Despite this finding, he was released. It also should be noted that the shooters at Columbine High School were also on antidepressant drugs. Jeff Weise, the shooter in the Red Lake High School Massacre, in March, 2005 was also on Prozac, as was Kip Kinkel, the shooter in the Springfield High School massacre, in Oregon, in 1998. Of course, the latest findings of Eli Lilly research show that their drugs do not cause violence or suicidal tendencies, which I’m sure, can be trusted unquestioningly. I suppose it’s just more coincidence that so many of these shooters, and others involved with violent crimes were on antidepressant drugs. Many of these massacres display the characteristics of black-op intelligence actions and ritual sacrifice but we’ll save that for another time.
In April, 2002 G.W. Bush established The New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, to “conduct a comprehensive study on the US mental health delivery system.” In 2004 the commission’s report called the New Freedom Initiative was published which calls for comprehensive mental health screening for all school children, preschoolers, and “consumers of all ages.” The commission sited the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) as a guideline for medication treatment plans, and it’s certainly no surprise that the TMAP guidelines encourage the use of newer and more expensive antidepressant drugs, and that the project was funded by several pharmaceutical companies that have contributed heavily to the election funds of G.W. Bush. The TMAP board is made up of individuals from drug companies, the mental health and corrections system of Texas, and the University of Texas, and some of its members have direct ties to the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. We will continue to witness an exponential increase in the number of prescribed SSRI* drugs over the next several years, and it’s crucial that people become aware of this agenda to mass medicate, and resist it. The drug companies and corrupted political [mis]leaders with connections to them, have no problem with profiting in the billions while destroying people’s lives.
Over the last several years, Influenza shots have been hyped and pushed in the media and medical establishment relentlessly. The establishment especially recommends the flu shots for young children and the elderly, those with the weakest immune systems. In the recommended childhood vaccine schedule for the United States, flu shots for children as young as six months old are recommended. The regiment of recommended shots is approved by the Advisory Committee of Immunization Practices (CDC); The American Academy of Pediatrics (receives money from pharmaceutical companies); and the American Academy of Family Physicians (receives massive funding from drug companies). Parents line up each winter to dutifully inject their babies with shit that the CDC approves, and that rakes in billions in profits for the manufacturers and those within government and regulatory agencies whose wheels are greased, if you get my meaning.
I watch with amazement each year as the media uses its scare tactics to convince the public that not getting their yearly flu shot is tantamount to a death sentence. It’s an interesting observation; people wait in line to get injected with poison and they actually believe they are becoming healthier. Sometimes the locations that administer the shots for free run out of vaccines. Many people get fearful and upset when that happens because their minds have become so indoctrinated and conditioned by the media and medical establishments. By the time you get your free shot, you can’t even really be sure if the strain you are being injected with is the same strain that is going around. Curiously, the flu shots are even recommended for pregnant women, even though the Influenza vaccine has never been tested on pregnant animals or humans. There have been documented cases of flu vaccines causing women’s pregnancies to abort. In 2006 the Israeli health ministry stopped the administering of flu vaccines after three people died following inoculation. I suppose they don’t have to worry about catching the flu now.
With the amazing advancements in medicine in the US and globally, now you don’t even have to get injected for Influenza prevention. Now you can simply snort live flu viruses up your nose to maintain your health and well being. Gilead, the manufacturer of a drug called Tamiflu, advocates “protecting your children” on their website and they even suggest administering their live virus nasal spray to children as young as one. Funny, their website didn’t seem to mention that Tamiflu has been linked to a number of childhood suicides, or that the FDA reported over 100 cases of hallucinations and psychiatric problems directly related to the drug in 2005-2006. Since 2003, 169 people have died globally from the bird flu. Tamiflu has killed 54 people since 2004. So which is worse, the Avian bird flu (H5N1) or the Tamiflu? In 2007, Reuters news service reported that Japanese government figures released in March, 2007 claimed:
“15 people aged 10 to 19 have jumped from buildings, while another who was taking Tamiflu jumped in front of a truck and was killed.”
To me, the idea of snorting a live virus is simply disturbing. I think I’ll just take my chances with the scary bird flu, and willfully not partake in “snorting flu” and avoid becoming suicidal. The fact that this drug has been approved without proper research, and is killing kids, is sickening. The US placed an order for the Tamiflu drug, at a cost of $100.00 per dose, which translates to $2 billion in profits for Gilead. When we’re talking about billions of dollars in profits, it really doesn’t matter to the manufacturers that kids want to commit suicide from taking their worthless drugs. Then again, as I stated, this is about more than money. The Consortium, the orchestrators of this superimposed reality, get off on profiting from death, misery and destruction. Their psychotic attitude is that if they can make obscene profits while they kill you, then that is a successful business plan.
On November 20, 2006, Reuters reported that the US government had contracted for $200 million worth of Avian Flu vaccine, enough to vaccinate 2.7 million people. GlaxoSmithKline is one of the three manufacturers that were awarded the contracts. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) eventually plans to stockpile enough vaccines for 20 million people. I’d be willing to bet that as the stockpiles increase, we will witness a bird flu panic (now Ebola) fueled by government and media propaganda. Then people will be flocking to their doctor, or the nearest clinic to obtain “protection” from the deadly disease. After the mass inoculations, that’s when we’ll probably see a real outbreak. In April 2007, the CDC conducted drills in Atlanta simulating a bird flu pandemic, and in 2004, Russian health experts warned that the HN51 virus could possibly kill up to a billion people. The mass hysteria created by these panics generated billions in profits for the pharmaceutical industry and I feel pretty confident that soon we will see an Ebola vaccine being pushed.
A document drafted in 1974 by the US National Security Council, under the title of: National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for US Security and Overseas Interests (NSMM 200) was adopted as official US policy by President Gerald Ford in November, 1975. The report, drafted under the supervision of Henry Kissinger, advocates the encouragement of population reduction including contraception. The document stresses the need to operate discretely and remain covert:
“In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion.”
The document calls for “constructive actions to lower fertility,” and targets countries such as: Mexico, the Philippines, India, Ethiopia, Bangladesh and several others. Is it possible that the vaccine campaigns, especially in third world countries are part of an agenda to covertly depopulate, or inhibit reproduction? I would suggest that it’s not only possible, but that it is actually what is happening.
In 1980, during the Carter administration, Secretary of State Edmund Muskie endorsed as official policy a document titled: The Global 2000 Report. This report concerned the reduction of populations and was drafted by the Council on Environmental Quality and the Department of State. In the document, Edmund Muskie called for:
“The elimination of 2 billion human beings by the year 2000.”
Perhaps they’re a bit behind schedule; however with the continually increasing poisons within our environment, bodies and minds, maybe they are not that far off? A former intelligence agent by the name of Dr. John Coleman, author of the book The Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Committee of 300, states that Africa’s agricultural collapse is due to Global 2000 policies of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and other agencies. Organizations such as the IMF set policies in third world countries that actually prevent nations from developing by initiating guidelines that in effect keep poor countries under control by what could be termed economic enslavement.
Retired congressman Richard Ottinger, in 1981 stated:
“Overpopulation is a national security question. We have much greater demand on our food stocks, and we will make God-like decisions on who lives and who does not.”
The arrogance of such a statement is staggering. And just who is it that makes the god-like decisions that determine who lives and dies? Was the congressman referring to his staff? Was he referring to the US Congress? Was he referring to his hidden masters?
A pharmaceutical scientist from Zaria, Nigeria named Dr. Haruna Kaita, studied samples of the Polio vaccine administered in Nigeria, by UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund). What Dr. Haruna and his colleagues found was that the vaccines contained sterilization agents. Of course the vaccines had already been administered to many Nigerians, including children. Utilizing testing technology recommended by the WHO (World Heath Organization) Dr Haruna concluded:
“Some of the things we discovered in the vaccines are harmful, toxic; some have direct effect on the human reproductive system”
Dr Haruna went on to state:
“These manufacturers or promoters of these harmful things have a secret agenda which only further research can reveal. Secondly they have always taken us in the third world for granted, thinking we don’t have the capacity, knowledge and equipment to conduct tests that would reveal such contaminants. And very unfortunately they also have people to defend their atrocities within our midst, and worst still some of these are supposed to be our own professionals who we rely on to protect our interests.”
Dr. Haruna and his colleagues discovered an agenda to inject the population of Nigeria with sterilization agents, fronted by the United Nations under the guise of protecting Nigerians. The Polio vaccine isn’t even that effective. The British medical journal, The Lancet, reported that in Oman, between 1988-1989, a Polio outbreak occurred which affected thousands of children who had already been fully vaccinated, and that the regions with the highest outbreaks were those that received higher rates of inoculation. Regions that experienced fewer outbreaks received less of a percentage of vaccinations. The shots actually caused the condition they were supposed to prevent. I certainly wouldn’t be surprised to find that the Polio shots in Oman contained similar ingredients as those found in the vaccines administered in Nigeria.
This isn’t the only time it had been discovered that UNICEF was administering tainted vaccines. In 1995, a court order in the Philippines ordered UNICEF to stop administering Tetanus shots in that nation, due to the discovery of contaminants in the vaccines. It was discovered that 20% of the Tetanus vaccines contained a hormone called hCG (human chorionic gonadotrophin). The hCG hormone is produced by women during pregnancy and maintains progesterone (supports gestation) production that is critical for a pregnancy. The hCG hormone is also critical in preventing disintigration of the corpus luteum, an endocrine structure which produces hormones that are critical to maintaining a pregancy. The injection of this hormone into women caused their bodies to develop an immune respose (the immune system went into stasis) thereby causing antibodies to attack and destroy their own natural hormones. This caused women to experience abortions, vaginal bleeding and irregular fertility cycles. In the Phillipines, (one of the countries mentioned in the NSMM 200 reoport) the Department of Health found 20% of Tetanus vaccines tested to be contaminated with the hCG hormones.
As this was being discovered, it had also been determined by the Supreme Court in the Phillipines, that 3 million women aged 12-45 had already been given the injections. Of course, the only way for the hCG hormones to get into vaccines is if they are isolated and intentionally placed there, and the WHO has a history of researching anti-fertility vaccines. It has also been established that Tetanus shots in Nicaragua were contaminated with hCG, as well as in Mexcio, another on the target list of the NSMM 200 report. Native American and African American women in the US were also given Tetanus shots containing hCG. It’s certainly no surprise to me that over 35% of Native American women are now sterile, and over 25% of African American women are also sterile. This is a global campaign of genocide, plain and simple.
In Nigeria, massive boycotts of the Polio vaccine have ensued in four states/regions. Nigerian leaders claimed that the inoculations were part of a US plan to spread AIDS or sterilization agents, and launched an investigation to discover the ingredients of the Polio vaccines. Some testing revealed the presence of estradiol, a form of female estrogen, which Nigerian investigators claimed could cause infertility.
An African researcher and human rights campaigner named Kihura Nkuba, discovered that Africans that were HIV positive were given the oral Polio vaccine. The oral Polio vaccine is not even used in the US anymore. Nkuba contacted the CDC and asked them about administering Polio vaccine to an HIV positive person. The CDC spokesperson responded that doing so would basically be a death sentence. Nkuba taped the reponse, and after he played the conversation on the radio, an attempt was made on his life. Nkuba pointed out, that in Uganda, the government adopted a policy to arrest those who resisted vaccinations. Nkuba, in an open letter, stated that:
“A notorious councilor from Bushenyi District, the district local council speaker, Odo Tayebwa, moves from house to house, dragging children hidden underneath their beds to be vaccinated at gun point.”
Nkuba further stated:
“In other villages police armed to the teeth moved from house to house searching for children to immunize.”
Could you imagine being forced to vaccinate your child at gunpoint? People can say “it can never happen here” all they want; however, legislation is in place to force vaccines in the US. In the aftermath of the attacks of September 11, 2001, legislation has been proposed in the US that would make Hitler and Stalin envious. One of such pieces of legislation is known as the Model Emergency Health Powers Act (MEHPA). Under the provisions of the MEHPA, all that is needed to conduct mandatory vaccinations, is for state governors to declare a “public health emergency.” According to the bill, a public health emergency could be declared when there is an “occurrence,” and is based on the say-so of state authorities at the sole discretion of state governors. This act gives authority to the state to seize property that has been decided could “endanger the public health.” This includes private property, and if the property is labeled “contaminated,” it could be legally destroyed without compensation to the owners. Some of the outlines of this draconian piece of legislation include:
- The right of state authorities to quarantine individuals that refuse medical treatment in “quarantine facilities” (concentration camps).
- Authorities would be completely unaccountable for any adverse reactions caused by mandatory vaccines or other medical treatment.
- Those refusing forced medical treatment could be charged with a crime.
- Gives the state sole authority to declare an “emergency.”
- Grants the right of state governors to seize and even destroy or condemn private property, without compensation.
- Gives the government access to private medical records.
- The right to force conscription for public service, or risk being charged with a crime.
- Greatly expand government interference with commerce.
- Gives the state the right to commandeer any private property or resources it deems necessary, including real estate, communications and food.
- The right to suspend any state law that may interfere with the declared emergency.
Under the requirements of the MEHPA, state governors could in effect grant themselves dictatorial power and no repeal could be made of their emergency powers for 60 days, at which time, they could simply claim that the emergency is still in effect, and their authority could essentially go unchecked indefinitely. Something to consider: with all of the hyped hysteria concerning Influenza, Ebola or whatever, a real emergency doesn’t even have to exist. The governments could simply declare that an emergency or outbreak is imminent, disseminate fear through the media, and place anyone into the quarantine camps that refuse to be vaccinated. At that point, they could conduct mass vaccinations against the population, and since the authorities would not even be held accountable, they could inject people with hCG hormones, other sterilization agents, or even Ebola itself, to cause an outbreak. I feel that this is one scenario that people should be aware of, and that it is absolutely crucial to resist this type of totalitarian, draconian legislation.
The Global Alliance for Vaccine and Immunization (GAVI) is a network of entities launched by Bill Gates in 1999. Included in the alliance is: The World Bank, The WHO, UNICEF, National Governments, the Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and wait for it, the vaccine industry. GAVI’s main goal is to vaccinate as many in impoverished countries as possible it seems. They advocate inoculation programs, siting the lack of vaccines in third world countries as an “injustice,” but I’m sure their campaign to vaccinate has nothing to do with profits or with sterilization. I’m sure their agenda is benevolent and they really, really care about you.
GAVI lists a number of countries which they “support” or intend to, including: Bangladesh, India, Ethiopia, and Nigeria, all of which were mentioned in the NSMM 200 report. The Gates Foundation gave $23 million to an organization called Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH) to inoculate for Tetanus in the third world. It’s interesting to note that the former name of PATH was the Program for the Introduction and Adaptation of Contraceptive Technology. What exactly is “contraception technology?” Might that refer to sterilization additives in vaccines? Among PATH’s partners are the WHO and UNICEF. Both PATH and GAVI are involved in research to develop an HIV vaccine, and PATH is beginning introductions of inoculations in India, Peru, Uganda and Vietnam to vaccinate for HPV. Well thank goodness for the benevolent pharmaceutical companies, and agencies like GAVI that want to “help” those impoverished people by vaccinating them.
Could the millions and billions spent on agendas to vaccinate impoverished, starving people be better spent elsewhere? Why does there appear to be such a dramatic push to vaccinate the people in impoverished third world countries? Do people living in poverty, that are malnourished, already have compromised immune systems and do not have pure drinking water truly benefit from vaccinations? If the money spent on vaccines were used instead to improve sanitation, provide proper nourishment and clean water, would we see a natural increase in overall health in impoverished nations? How can compromising an already compromised immune system with vaccines be beneficial? What is really going on behind agendas such as GAVI’s to vaccinate masses of people?
Perhaps a doctor by the name of Archie Kalokerinos summed it up when he stated:
“My final conclusion after 40 years or more in this business is that the unofficial policy of the World Health Organization and the unofficial policy of the Save the Children’s fund and almost all those organizations is one of murder and genocide.”
Or, as Dr. Herbert Shelton conjectured:
“They are as cold blooded as any class of criminals. Indeed, I know of no other class of criminals who live by crippling, maiming and killing babies and children. Belief in immunization is a form of delusional insanity.”
When it is discovered what the real forces are behind the corporations and organizations that develop and push vaccines, the ones that devise plans such as NSMM 200 and Global 2000, it becomes obvious that Dr. Shelton is absolutely correct. The vaccine paradigm, that claims inoculations bring health, is just one area in which we’ve been completely indoctrinated to accept nonsense as proven, scientific truth. And it’s not just a few kooky doctors that are saying these things. There have been numerous doctors, nurses, former CDC employees, and health care professionals etc. that have come forward with the same basic conclusions. They are often attacked relentlessly and have their careers destroyed. The information that exists to support these claims is simply staggering. If the masses suddenly came to the realization that they’ve been lied to, and that vaccines are actually harmful, it would cause outrage and interrupt the flow of billions of dollars into the coffers of the pharmaceutical corporations and the dark occultists that control them.
It is certainly no crazy conspiracy theory to claim that the medical establishment, and especially so in the United States, has become corrupted by the pharmaceutical industry. The United States makes up roughly 5% of the global population yet consumes 56% of the world’s drugs! Americans consume 80% of the world’s pain pills! There seems to be pills on the market for just about any condition, real or imagined that possibly exists. Toxins are introduced almost from the time we’re born, or even, in the womb, when pregnant women are vaccinated. There is an agenda to this. As painful as it is for the mind to cope with the information being revealed in this age, it is so crucial to understand it. For those that can’t escape their own programmed conditioning; the ones who cannot suspend what they think they know, in order to discover new information, it would be a waste of time looking into it. However, more people are becoming aware of the established, control paradigms and the imminent failure of them as the masks of falsehood are being ripped away in this age of revealing.
The $75,000 challenge
In 2006, a man by the name of Jock Doubleday, the director of a California based, non profit organization, posed an offer to any medical doctor, or pharmaceutical company CEO, to publicly drink the same amount of vaccine additives recommended for a six-year-old, according to the 2005 guidelines of the CDC. The offer claims that the mixture will not contain any viruses or bacteria, but only standard additive ingredients in their usual amounts. Doubleday increased the list of potential candidates to include the 14 members of the CDC’s 2006 Advisory Committee on Immunization practices. The reward for drinking the mixture would be seventy-five-thousand dollars. I don’t care what profession you work in or how much you make; 75 Grand is a nice piece of change.
Doublday originally offered $20,000 in 2001, but apparently he raised the stakes. He claims to have had 14 offers since then, from doctors or those claiming to be, but that none followed through. You don’t say? That’s probably because drinking the same mixture that is injected into children would most likely kill you. The vaccine manufacturers and medical establishment claim that vaccines are safe and effective, indeed, necessary. In the offer, Doubleday has a stipulation that since potential candidates routinely administer vaccinations, or profit from them, that they obviously must consider the mixture to be safe. And still no takers? No one in their right mind would try to obtain the $75K reward, and yet it is safe to inject those additives into the bloodstream of infants and young children? The offer is specifically for those in the health care establishment or the vaccine industry; the institutions that insist upon vaccinating, and that claim that vaccines are completely safe. So why has nobody in these fields come forward to lay to rest the claims of the skeptics, and obtain $75,000 in the process, simply by drinking a “safe” mixture of vaccine additives?
Little known vaccine facts:
- Many vaccines contain the additive ethylene glycol, the same ingredient used in antifreeze.
- In 1989, the CDC reported that 89% of all school-aged children that contracted measles had been vaccinated against the disease.
- Prior to 1990, the medical establishment was not required by law to report adverse reactions of vaccines to the CDC.
- Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, millions of people were vaccinated with Polio vaccines that were contaminated with the SV-40 virus. SV-40 (Simian Virus #40) is known to cause Cancer, and is considered a powerful immune system suppressor. SV-40 is said to be a trigger for HIV.
- Vaccinations break the skin; therefore they are technically considered surgery. In the US all surgery requires consent; however, consent is rarely attained or freely given prior to administering vaccinations.
- Private insurance companies have completely abandoned coverage due to vaccine damage.
- In 1986 there were 1,300 cases of whooping cough reported in Kansas, 90% of which were children who were adequately vaccinated.
- Only approximately 10% of adverse vaccine reactions ever get reported.
- Incidences of SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) increased as the number of vaccines increased.
- Unbiased scientific research has shown a connection between SIDS and vaccinations.
- Roughly one-third of doctors in the US refuse to be vaccinated.
- The steady rise in the amount of vaccines given has coincided with an identical rise in the incidences of autoimmune diseases in children.
- The BBC revealed in 2004, that a number of HIV positive foster children in New York City were given experimental drugs, which often produced serious side effects. The children were given experimental drugs without the consent of their relatives or guardians. If the children refused, they were forced to take the drugs through a tube inserted in the stomach.
- In 1990, the British medical establishment discovered a link between GlaxoSmithKline’s MMR vaccine and Meningitis in children that received the shots. Despite the findings, the British government sanctioned the shots for another two years.
- Japanese medical officials determined that between 2000-2002, five people suffered Guillain-Barre syndrome-a muscle disease-as a direct result of receiving the flu vaccine.
- Aluminum used as an additive in vaccinations has been directly linked to Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease.
- Between 20% and 50% of people vaccinated do not develop resistance to the disease for which they are vaccinated against.
- In 2005, the state of New York banned the use of mercury in vaccines due to its toxicity.
- 7 vaccines routinely administered to children, have not been tested for their carcinogenic potential (ability to cause Cancer). This includes the Polio vaccine; Whooping Cough vaccine and the Hepatitis vaccine, and this is according to the manufacturers own product inserts.
- There have been no long term studies of the cumulative effect of 11 vaccines on children’s developing immune systems.
- In May 2007, the Vietnamese government suspended the use of a Hepatitis vaccine after three infants died from the shots.
- Also in May, 2007, six Australian schoolgirls were hospitalized after receiving the HPV vaccine Gardasil.
- So far roughly 36,000 adverse reactions to Gardasil have been reported, including fetal abortions.
It’s important to realize that the aforementioned is merely a summary. Massive amounts of data exists, supported by health professionals, that backs up everything stated here. I tried to include as many sources as possible, so that the reader can research for themselves and come to their own conclusions. It is not a pretty picture. Humanity has been duped and misinformed on so many levels that once a person discovers the level of indoctrination, it can be literally overwhelming.
Guinea Pig Soldiers
Prior to the first gulf war in 1991, soldiers were given a barrage of vaccinations, including experimental vaccines. This has led many to conclude-even astute scientists-that the vaccinations have been the cause of a condition known as “Gulf War Syndrome.” I personally know a young man that served in the military and he told me that he was made to get in line to receive literally dozens of vaccines, one after another. He told me that by the time that he reached the end of the line, he promptly passed out as a result of the shots.
Scientific researchers make their case by pointing out that the symptoms associated with Gulf War Syndrome are practically unheard of among British, Saudi, Canadian, and Iraqi soldiers that fought in the gulf war. Numerous experimental drugs were administered to soldiers that served in Desert Storm, among them, the largely controversial Anthrax vaccine. In an open statement to the US Senate, Senator John D. Rockefeller IV, Chairman for the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs claimed in part:
“The results of our investigation showed a reckless disregard that shocked me, and I think they will shock all Americans. The use of investigational drugs in the Persian Gulf is especially troublesome. The Pentagon…threw caution to the winds, ignoring all warnings of potential harm, and gave these drugs to hundreds of thousands of soldiers with virtually no warnings and no safeguards.”
To put it bluntly, hundreds of thousands of young American military personnel were used as guinea pigs for drug experiments. If that weren’t bad enough, thousands of veterans that need serious medical attention are not treated properly by the VA, (Veteran Affairs) because the records are sealed and the VA lacks the information needed to properly treat these veterans. Senator Rockefeller further stated in his address:
“The situation is unfair from start to finish. It begins with soldiers who are asked to participate in research, to take experimental drugs, but are not told what the risks are before, during, or after. Then, information about the exposures is not included in soldiers’ medical records, putting them at even greater risk. And, when these soldiers leave the service and become veterans, the VA lacks information about the exposures, and about any resulting illnesses, making it more difficult to help them. Finally, when these veterans become ill, they are unable to get the medical records and other information they need in order to prove that their illnesses are related to military service.”
Senator Rockefeller sourced his information from an intensive study conducted by committee staff. The results of the committee investigation were presented in a hearing on May 6, 1994, and the findings of the committee are absolutely staggering. The report concluded that for more than 50 years, hundreds of thousands of soldiers have been involved in “human experimentation” by the Department of Defense (DoD) often without their knowledge or consent. Among some of the findings of the study are the following:
- “US troops [that served in Desert Storm] were intentionally exposed to investigational drugs and vaccines… In still other cases, soldiers were exposed to biological agents or other dangerous substances that DoD was studying; the goal was to study the substances, not their effect on humans.”
- “In this report, we will examine how decisions made by DoD regarding the use of investigational drugs and vaccines in the Persian Gulf War were based on inadequate information and in some cases by ignoring evidence that soldiers would be harmed unnecessarily. We will also discuss how the DoD’s failure to provide medical treatment or information to soldiers was unjustifiable, unethical, sometimes illegal, and caused unnecessary suffering.”
- “In addition, information about the use of these investigational drugs and vaccines, and adverse reactions that resulted, usually were not included in soldiers’ medical records. As a result, veterans who became ill following the use of these medical products are often unable to prove that their illness or disability was related to their military service.”
- “The Code [Nuremburg Code that governs human experimentation] states that voluntary and informed consent is absolutely essential at all times, wartime included. Additionally, current law prevents funds appropriated to the Department of Defense from being used for research involving a human being as an experimental subject unless the informed consent of the subject is obtained in advance.”
The report goes on to site experiments in the 1950’s in which soldiers were unwittingly given lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) without consent or knowledge, to chronicle the effects of the powerful, mind altering drug. Could you imagine if troops armed with automatic weapons in combat were tripping on acid?
The study goes on to reveal that federal agencies conducted radiation experiments on soldiers, veterans and civilians alike during the Cold War, which only became public knowledge in the mid-1990s. In August of 1990, according to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, the DoD contacted the FDA to review regulatory restrictions concerning the DoD’s intention of administering pyridostigmine and botulism vaccine to troops that would serve in the Persian Gulf. The FDA pointed out that these vaccines were investigational, but the DoD insisted that they had the authority to “dictate the use of unapproved FDA regulated products,” but that they would prefer obtaining a waiver from the FDA. On December 31, 1990 the FDA and DoD reached an agreement that: “information would be provided orally at minimum, and in written form if feasible, to all personnel receiving the vaccine.” However, many soldiers claimed that they were never told about the vaccinations, or that they were ordered to keep quiet. The Committee on Veterans’ Affairs report goes on:
“Despite these agreements between FDA and DoD, and DoD’s official subsequent decision to administer the vaccine voluntarily, many PGW veterans claim that they were not told what vaccine they were being given, or what the risks were, either orally or in writing. Many report that they were told not to tell medical personnel that they had received a vaccination, even if the vaccination caused pain or swelling. No record of the vaccine was available in medical records; as a result, physicians who were concerned about any local or systemic reactions were uninformed about the possible causes. Veterans who claim they were harmed by the vaccine or pyridostigmine frequently have no proof that they were vaccinated or took the pills, or that they had an adverse reaction. Moreover, virtually none of the soldiers received more than two of the botulism vaccinations, even though DoD informed FDA they would administer the three shots necessary for protection.”
A waiver was granted to the DoD on January 8, 1991. FDA Commissioner, David Kessler, in a letter to Assistant Secretary of Health of the DoD claimed that: “there was no available satisfactory alternative therapy for protection.” The report goes on to claim that the DoD actively sought a permanent waiver, to decrease the potential risk of liability:
“Since the end of the Persian Gulf War, DoD has repeatedly requested that the waiver of informed consent be made permanent, arguing that ‘to not finalize it provides an arguable defect under the Administrative Procedures Act and leaves both DoD and FDA open to greater liability.’ To finalize the interim rule would grant unrestricted use of investigational drugs by military personnel, even when efficacy and safety have not been established.”
In early 1994, the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs interviewed 146 Persian Gulf War veterans that complained about numerous side effects of drugs and vaccines administered to them. They also complained about the lack of compassion of VA doctors, the loss of their medical records and the general lack of quality care. One soldier interviewed claimed that vaccinations that were administered were stricken from his medical record. Others complained that their medical records had simply disappeared.
On June 19, 2005, the Las Vegas Sun ran a story covering a US Army report released in May of 2005, claiming that over 1,200 soldiers who received the Anthrax vaccination prior to deployment in Iraq, have suffered adverse reactions. Among some of the reactions to the shots, according to the Army’s own report, include: sleep and memory loss, chronic fatigue, headaches and chest pains. Officials at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington DC, claim that over 1.3 million military personnel and civilians have received the Anthrax vaccine since 1998. Despite the controversy, and the admitted reactions and potential dangers of the shots, both the FDA and Congress have approved the continued and increased funding of the use of American soldiers as guinea pigs.
Despite even official studies proving the adverse effects of vaccines on unsuspecting soldiers, the use of these horrific substances continues virtually unchallenged. Those few courageous people that do challenge all of the lies that the public is told, are ridiculed, or their research is dismissed. A major public outcry would most likely create a catalyst for further investigation, and perhaps encourage putting a stop to this insanity, but as long as the public is simply willing to believe what they are told via the media, the misuse of American soldiers will continue. Interestingly, the vast majority of people that jump on the “support the troops” bandwagon are the same type of people that will turn away from a homeless veteran in the streets asking for assistance; the same mindless drones that will never bother to do any degree of research that might assist in getting this information to a wider public audience. To these do-nothing know-nothings, supporting the troops consists of wearing some stupid t-shirt, displaying a magnetic yellow ribbon on their automobile, or mindlessly nodding their heads in approval of an illegal war.
The gulf war lasted less than 7 weeks. Official numbers place the fatality rate at 269, with 458 wounded. It seems a bit odd, that despite the official statistics, 159,238 gulf war veterans have been labeled disabled, and that is according to the government’s own numbers! It is now established that experimental vaccines were used on soldiers prior to deployment to the Persian Gulf, one of which was the highly controversial Anthrax vaccine. It is also quite possible, and has been argued by researchers that Gulf War Syndrome may have come about due to the US military’s indiscriminate use of depleted uranium during Operation Desert Storm. The use of depleted uranium munitions can be considered a form of nuclear war and the results are extremely horrific. In this insane asylum, war is the greatest generator of profits.
Whatever is the true cause of Gulf War Syndrome, one thing is clear: over 100,000 soldiers that served are now suffering horrific side effects either to Depleted Uranium poisoning or to the experimental vaccinations they were given. The rate of deformed children born in Iraq has skyrocketed, and so has the rate of deformed children being born to US gulf war veterans. 67% of babies born to veterans suffering with Gulf War Syndrome have birth defects.
Symptoms of Gulf War Syndrome:
- Chronic fatigue
- Memory loss
- Skin rashes
- Aching muscles
- Weight loss
- Birth defects and stillbirths of children born to gulf war veterans
- Neurological disorders
- Sleep disturbances
- Cardiovascular symptoms
- Menstrual disorders
Of course the federal government denies that such a condition even exists. I guess when gulf war veterans have children that are born with extreme birth defects; they must just be imagining it. The government has claimed that the overwhelming number of disabled US, gulf war veterans, may have been the victims of chemical weapons used by Hussein’s military during the war. If that’s true, then another can of worms is opened because it is indisputable, that Iraq obtained the majority of its components for chemical weapons from US and British corporations. This is part of the public record. Meanwhile, veterans are denied treatment they desperately need because of the cover-up of this epidemic. The government has thought nothing of experimenting on US soldiers with largely untested, potentially harmful vaccinations and LSD. Do you think they would have a problem with lying and covering up the truth about Gulf War Syndrome? Neither do I.
Is industrial waste good for teeth?
One of the great lies of the twentieth century that still prevails is the nonsense concerning the use of fluoride in drinking water and in dental care products such as toothpaste and mouthwash. People have been indoctrinated to believe that fluoride is beneficial to protecting against tooth decay, but how many actually know what fluoride is, or where it comes from? How many would even bother to ask?
Fluoride is a waste product in the manufacturing of phosphorous chemicals. In decades past, the fluoride used to medicate drinking water came from the waste of the manufacturing of aluminum. It was also the chief chemical used in atomic bomb production. Scientists working on the Manhattan Project, that developed the first atomic bombs, used massive quantities of fluoride to manufacture bomb-grade plutonium and uranium, essential in the development of nuclear weapons. Government documents discovered by researchers Chris Bryson and Joel Griffiths show that the lethal effects of fluoride were understood, and that agencies such as the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) censored information concerning the adverse effects of the lethal chemical. The documents also reveal:
- Fluoride became the leading health hazard of the US atomic bomb program.
- Research that “proves” that fluoride is safe in small doses was conducted by the atomic bomb research scientists.
- Human studies on water fluoridation were conducted in Newburgh, New York from 1945-1956. Blood and tissue samples of Newburgh citizens was collected and analyzed, in a covert operation called “Program F.”
- The fluoride safety studies were conducted clandestinely, under “national security” guidelines at Rochester University, where radiation experiments were conducted on unsuspecting hospital patients* during the Cold War.
Fluoride is also the main ingredient in Sarin Nerve Gas and is the primary toxin found in pesticides and rat poison. It also happens to be a main ingredient of the SSRI drug Prozac. Fluoride is a byproduct of a gas called Fluorine, which is used in the aluminum and phosphorous chemical industries as mentioned.
The public, as well as the dental care industry have been subject to over 50 years of pure propaganda concerning this harmful toxin. In the 1950s, a company called ALCOA (Aluminum Company of America) the largest manufacturer of aluminum, realized that they had an overabundance of their toxic waste and that to dispose of it would be very costly. A campaign of “research” ensued, to convince the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) that fluoride was good for teeth, and that it would be a good idea to add it to drinking water and toothpaste. This enabled industries to now sell their waste product at a 20,000% markup! The disposal of a toxic waste product, which would have been extremely costly, was now highly profitable.
The American Dental Association says that fluoride is a “naturally occurring substance in water;” however, the fluoride that is used to medicate public drinking water supplies is actually hydrofluorosilicic acid, and purchased in bulk from chemical companies. The “science” conducted that showed fluoride to prevent tooth decay was no doubt funded by corporations such as ALCOA, and in 2006, it was discovered that the FDA never tested for the safety of fluoride consumption.
In 1951, the American Dental Association claimed:
“There is no proof that commercial preparations such as tablets, dentifrices, mouthwashes or chewing gum containing fluorides are effective in preventing dental decay. Unfortunately such preparations are being offered to the public without adequate scientific evidence of their value.”
In 2006, the AMA (American Medical Association) admitted that no studies were ever conducted on the side effects of fluoride.* In 2007, the CDC admitted that fluoride used in the medication of drinking water contains arsenic. Yet in 2006, the FDA approved the use of fluoride in bottled drinking water!
The chemical company giant DOW, who manufactures pesticides among many other volatile chemicals, began lobbying to the EPA in 2006, to allow them to spray hundreds of food products with a fluoride-based pesticide called sulfuryl fluoride. The EPA claims that sulfuryl fluoride is excellent for pest control due to its toxicity. Don’t worry though; it’s completely safe for humans and crucial to maintaining healthy teeth. DOW manufactured the poison “agent orange” which was used during the Vietnam War as a crop destroying agent and has caused illness in those exposed to it. They are also the inventors of napalm. DOW is one of the planet’s major polluters, and they now face over a billion dollars in lawsuits due to their damaging, silicone breast implants. Isn’t it a bit unnerving that this chemical company wants to spray food products with fluoride? Do you think they give a shit about people’s dental hygiene? As usual, there is much more going on beneath the surface than what most people can even begin to comprehend. As with vaccines and antidepressant drugs, this is about more than profit; it is about control. When it is discovered what fluoride actually does, and who the first people were to put it into water, the agenda becomes obvious.
Fluoride is a carcinogen which accumulates in bones and weakens them. Too much intake of this poison can cause a condition called Dental Fluorosis, which damages tooth development, and leaves teeth pitted, brown or yellow, and destroys enamel. The CDC’s own documents show a 9% increase in Fluorosis than was present 20 years ago. The aluminum and chemical industry’s pure venom is turning up in more products, and being added to water supplies all over the world. As of 2002, 65.8% of the United State’s drinking water supply is fluoridated according to the CDC.
People that have Thyroid conditions such as Grave’s Disease are forbidden to use fluoride, because of its interaction with the thyroid gland in blocking iodine receptors. Fluoride accumulates in the bones and increases the chances of hip or skeletal fractures in the elderly, or people with weak bones; it increases the risk of Down’s syndrome in newborns, causes infertility, contains arsenic, and is a mutagen (causes mutation, specifically of the DNA). Fluoride has a higher toxicity rating than lead and is only slightly less toxic than arsenic. Recent studies have shown that fluoride accumulates in the pineal gland. As early as 1950, the Journal of the American Dental Association disclosed the fact that fluoride is poison:
“Some of the basic and necessary metabolic processes in the cells are stopped by concentrations of fluorides such as are found in acute poisoning. These changes are comparable to those seen in high-grade anoxia [lack of oxygen in the body and tissues] and are the basis for describing fluorides as general protoplasmic poisons.”
Most people don’t even realize that the fluoridated toothpaste they use contains a warning on the back of the tube, stating to contact poison control immediately if too much toothpaste is swallowed. It’s safe though. No really!
The most important reason for the push to fluoridate drinking water by the people that are really behind it is the fact that fluoride numbs the intellect and causes lethargy. High doses would kill you, so the drinking water is laced with small doses, enough to cause listlessness over a lifetime of ingestion. The use of fluoride in drinking water and products is part of an agenda for population control and interference with human DNA functioning.
The first fluoridation of drinking water occurred in the Soviet gulags and was later used in Nazi concentration camps such as Auschwitz during WW II. Perhaps the Nazis were concerned with the oral hygiene of the prisoners they were going to mass-murder? Water was fluoridated in the prison camps to induce sterilization and to promote docility among the inmates.
Charles Elliot Perkins was a research scientist, specializing in chemistry, who was sent to Germany during WW II, by the US, to oversee operations of the chemical company I.G. Farben. Farben was the brainchild behind the deadly nerve gas Zyklon B, and was the main supplier of oil to the Nazi war machine. I.G. Farben had direct business connections with American companies such as: the Ford Motor Company, GM, Standard Oil, ALCOA and DOW, and still exists through its subsidiaries such as Bayer.
Perkins discovered the plan of both the Germans and the Russians to fluoridate drinking water, and it certainly had nothing to do with preventing tooth decay. In a report titled: “the Dickinson Statement: a Mind Boggling Thesis,” Perkins stated:
“However-and I want to make this very definite and positive-the real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children’s teeth. If this were the real reason, there are many ways in which it could be done, which are much easier, cheaper and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty.”
Perkins discovered that I.G. Farben had intentions of fluoridating the water supplies in occupied countries, due to its effect on brain functioning. It was found that fluoride attacks particular parts of the brain that makes people more docile and more easily controlled. Perkins further stated:
“I say this in all earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years research into the chemistry, Bio-chemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine: any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person, mentally or physically.”
What better way to dispose of chemical waste products, than by convincing people that it is actually good for them? If you can profit while doing so, then all the better. The fact that fluoride is a mind/brain suppressant sheds light onto the true agenda behind the fluoridation of the world’s drinking water supplies. The obscene profits that these huge corporations make are a side benefit. I realize that this is hard to stomach for many people; nonetheless, it seriously needs to be exposed and understood. The creatures behind these companies and organizations are connected by genetics and bloodline and they work to attain the same agendas and goals. They view the public as nothing more than cattle. They are the so-called elites and they are ruthless in every sense of the word. The purpose for the mass fluoridation of water and tooth care products is to induce docility and apathy in the masses, to resist the ultimate goal of these sick people, which is absolute domination, and mass control of the population under a literal, global, totalitarian fascist super-state. Their plan seems to be working rather well, while the majority of people remain absolutely oblivious to it and display a level of denial that is truly staggering.
Toxic food additives
Another way that humans are poisoned mercilessly for profit and control is through the use of food additives. Artificial sweeteners, such as a chemical known as Aspartame are added to the food, and they can wreak havoc on the physical body and the mind. In the US, and increasingly globally, people are so overly concerned about their physical appearance; they will do virtually anything to maintain the standard of beauty that is set by the cultural paradigms we exist within. There exists here in the states a sort of anorexic and superficial standard of beauty, which is by the way absolutely intentional. That so many fall for this shallow idea of beauty, which denies the spirit and focuses only on the physical body is simply amazing to me.
It seems that if a woman weighs more than 120 pounds, she is considered “fat” and must go on a diet. What amazes me, is that so many are concerned about fat, carbohydrates, cholesterol, trans-fats, sugar, sodium etc. but have absolutely no care whatsoever about the chemicals in the foods they consume. I’ve seen so many people that are overly fixated on how many calories they take in that the foods they eat are like a college chemistry experiment. They consume diet sodas because there are no calories in it, and yet it contains a literally, lethal chemical.
Aspartame is used in many products, among them: cereals, mints, gum, frozen deserts, juice mixes and other beverages, vitamins, yogurt, sodas, artificial sweeteners, wine coolers, instant teas and coffee beverages and a list of other products. The FDA has received at least 10,000 complaints of adverse reactions to aspartame, and most people will never file an official complaint.
Aspartame was manufactured by a company known as GD Searle, which was bought by a company called Monsanto, a notorious entity that is responsible for genetically modified foods, bovine growth hormones, and a whole host of other toxic shit in the food supply. Searle’s own research in the mid 1970s showed that laboratory rats given Aspartame developed tumors; however, they falsified the studies, by cutting out tumors and placing the animals back into the tests.
For 16 years, the FDA refused to approve Aspartame because of its horrific side effects. It interacts with other toxins, hormones, insulin, cardiac medication and the list goes on. Aspartame is a neurotoxic poison. FDA scientists showed that Aspartame causes brain tumors, but a member of President Ronald Regan’s cabinet would install an FDA commissioner by the name of Arthur Hull Hayes, who approved Aspartame. His name was Donald Rumsfeld, the former president of G.D. Searle, and former secretary of defense under Gerald Ford and George W. Bush. A team of FDA scientists had concluded that Aspartame was toxic, but Hayes overruled the finding. Searle fudged facts and falsified research in an effort to get their poison approved.
An FDA task force examining G.D. Searle’s practices concluded the following:
- G.D. Searle scientists extracted tumors from test animals.
- Rather than perform autopsies on Rhesus Monkeys that suffered seizures after being fed Aspartame, Searle simply conducted other seizure studies that showed no problems.
- Animals that died were recorded as being alive.
- Searle deviated from basic protocols of several studies.
- “Inaccuracies” and “discrepancies” were discovered in the Searle studies.
- Written observations of pathology reports were purposely altered.
- Searle technicians failed to sign and date records, adhere to protocols or make accurate observations.
- Searle reported fewer tumors than had actually occurred.
- Searle delayed the reporting of negative findings.
The task force found much more than what is listed here. Essentially, G.D. Searle lied, covered up the true test results, and falsified information. Don Rumsfeld was instrumental in getting Aspartame approved for human consumption. This information comes from government documents, and is available to the public.
I have a friend who lives in Long Island, New York, who used to work for a company that services compressors for large industries. He phoned me one day to tell me that he had a job at a Sweet & Low factory, near the old Brooklyn Navy yard, in New York City. He told me that he and the workers had to wear protective equipment, including face masks. Why would this be, if Sweet & Low was just a harmless sweetener? Incidentally, one of the main ingredients of Sweet & Low is Aspartame.
At 86 degrees Fahrenheit, Aspartame decomposes into formaldehyde. Yummy! The three chief ingredients of Aspartame are:
- Methanol: methyl alcohol, a poisonous liquid that is used in the production of: formaldehyde, gasoline additives, paint strippers, carburetor cleaners for engines and other products. Methanol can cause blindness, and is completely toxic.
- Phenylalanine: an amino acid which is isolated from its original protein chain.
- Aspartic acid: an excitotoxin*, a compound that over-stimulates nerve cells and crosses the blood/brain barrier.
Excitotoxins can interfere with brain development and functioning, and many parents give their children products containing Aspartame unknowingly, believing them to be “healthier.” Nutra Sweet, another popular sweetener contains Aspartame, as does Equal, and so many other products. People have suffered all kinds of serious ailments due to the ingestion of this harmful poison. Most notably, Aspartame damages DNA, and that is the true purpose for its approval and its presence in so many products.
Interestingly, Aspartame actually causes the body to crave carbohydrates, and can make a person fatter. Because of the diet craze in the US, and much of the world, and the completely superficial standard of beauty, people will ingest pure poison, in order to maintain a certain image. And just like when you try to tell them about the dangers of SSRIs, or vaccines, see what happens when you tell them the diet cola they are drinking contains poison. Usually I get a completely dumb response such as: “they’d never do that.” The gullibility present within most is staggering to me.
Here’s another interesting little tidbit: if you have a problem with insects such as carpenter ants, simply purchase some Sweet & Low, or Equal, and lace the problem area with the sweetener. You will soon no longer have an ant problem, because the “harmless” sweetener will kill them!
A vast and growing number of people have been damaged, often permanently due to the ingestion of Aspartame. An astounding number of lawsuits have been filed and are more pending. The list of known symptoms is staggering, and recently, there was a push in the New Mexico state government to ban the use of Aspartame. There are 92 known symptoms associated with Aspartame, including death. Some of the symptoms include:
- Brain Cancer
- Breathing problems
- Burning urination
- Inability to think clearly
- Chronic Fatigue
- Hair loss
- Hearing loss
- Heart palpitations
- Memory loss
- Menstrual problems
- Vision loss
These are just a few of the conditions associated with the consumption of Aspartame. Stacks of government and FDA documents exist that shows that Searle falsified research data, and that Aspartame is poison, yet people will ignore it when it comes to their attention. They don’t want to hear it! I even had one woman-a registered nurse-say to me: “well, everything is bad for you in one way or another.” She used this idiotic statement to justify her use of Sweet & Low. With that attitude, why not smoke crack, or shoot up heroin? Everything’s bad, right? I think she made it obvious that Aspartame interacts with brain functioning.
In May, 2007, the British newspaper The Independent, reported that research from a British university concluded that Sodium Benzoate, a common additive in soft drinks and many other products, can lead to degenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease. When mixed with Vitamin C, Sodium Benzoate produces a substance called Benzene which is a carcinogen. The soft drink industry has been using this additive for years. But that’s not the least of it. The study concluded that Sodium Benzoate interacts with DNA. Every toxin mentioned thus far interferes with DNA and there is a reason behind the use of additives that do so. Professor of microbiology and biotechnology Peter Piper [sic] told The Independent that:
“These chemicals have the ability to cause severe damage to DNA in the mitochondria to the point that they totally inactivate it; they knock it out altogether.”
Mitochondria is sort of the powerhouse of the cells; it produces chemical energy. When damaged, the cells malfunction. Of course the WHO determined that Sodium Benzoate was safe, but that the science to support that finding was “limited.” Sometimes it seems as if humanity is a huge, living, biological experiment and the Earth is a giant Petri dish.
Another harmful additive found in many food products is a substance known as Monosodium Glutamate or MSG. MSG is an additive that increases flavor in food and is another excitotoxin. It crosses the blood/brain barrier, kills brain cells and is a neurotoxin. MSG has a direct effect on the hypothalamus gland, (links the nervous system to the endocrine system) and can cause food cravings, as can Aspartame. The same entities that control the food corporations that add this toxic crap to food also control the corporations that market “diet” products so it is a win-win situation for them.
The massive increase in obesity is largely due to the food additives that interfere with the hypothalamus gland. Of course, studies by researchers linked to the food corporations show additives such as MSG to be completely safe but independent research paints an entirely different picture. Studies have shown that lab animals fed MSG become obese, develop retinal damage and severe damage to the hypothalamus gland. MSG has a cumulative effect and has been linked to learning disabilities, endocrine disorders, stunted growth, and reproductive disorders. Can you guess what else it does? That’s right; it interferes with the DNA. MSG is added to a number of food products and can also be found in cosmetics, medications, fertilizers, plant growth enhancers, dietary supplements and many other products. It is also hidden in many products, even food that claims “no MSG” on the label.
Entire volumes could be written (and have been) concerning the additives found in food and other products which we consume. I will discuss just a few more here , as I’m sure that by now that you get the picture. Sodium Laureth Sulfate and Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS) are two agents used primarily in soaps, shampoos and conditioners that act as foaming agents. They are both also highly toxic. Both chemicals have a degenerative effect on the cell membranes. Sodium Lauryl Sulfate enters into the lungs, liver, heart and brain and can cross the blood/brain barrier. It can also cause retinal damage and harm the immune system as laboratory tests have shown. SLS can cause hormonal damage and a drop in sperm count in men as well as negative interactions with proteins. Can you guess what else it does?
The Monsanto Corporation manufactures a chemical called Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormones, (rBGH) which is used to increase milk production in dairy cows by way of injection. Bovine Growth Hormones are genetically modified copies of naturally occurring hormones present in cows. rBGH causes milking cows to produce as much as 15% more milk than they naturally would otherwise.
rBGH have been banned in Canada and Europe, and in fact in the entire industrialized world, due to its potential health hazards. These genetically modified hormones are carcinogenic, and the really disgusting thing about them is that due to the stress they put on the milking cows, pus is produced which gets into the milk. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) actually allows a certain amount of pus to be present within milk. They will not allow milk containing 750 million or more pus cells per liter to be shipped across state lines. The average milk sold in America contains only about 316 million pus cells per liter. That’s comforting to know, isn’t it?
Since the cows injected with rBGH are overproducing, they become stressed and sick and even Monsanto has admitted to 20 veterinary health risks including inflammation of the udders. They are therefore treated with antibiotic injections. Unfortunately, remnants of the hormones and the antibiotics wind up in your glass and on your plate. Not to mention the pus cells. Yummy! Of course in all of those silly advertisements we have here in the US, they never seem to mention the use of rBGH. I always have a chuckle when I see those famous people in the ridiculous commercials, with their milk mustaches (or PUStaches) and the caption asking: “got milk?” Got pus? Got rBGH? Got disease? One thing I feel very certain about: if Monsanto is behind something, it’s best to avoid it like the plague!
Of course, the FDA approved the use of rBGH without any real safety research or testing. Again, when it comes to increasing profits, health risks are not really a consideration with these multiconglomerate corporations. At the top of the pyramid, the same people that control the companies that supply these harmful toxins also control the pharmaceutical corporations and the sick-care industry.
Despite the fact that 95% of US dairy farmers have boycotted the use of rBGH, the FDA, EPA and USDA continue to license the harmful toxin even though no pre-market safety tests have been conducted. The use of rBGH causes persistent sores and lacerations in the cows, so the industry’s answer is simply to give them more drugs. It’s not so much the milk itself, but the drugs injected into the cows that make it harmful. Animals are turned into nothing more than production units and that applies to humanity as well.
Robert Cohen is an author/researcher who calls himself the Not-Milkman. He is responsible for a book titled Milk the Deadly Poison, which is a fantastic piece of work. He also runs a website called notmilk.com which contains a wealth of information. I recommend these two sources for those interested in the truth concerning what the true ingredients of “nature’s most perfect food” actually are. I haven’t even scratched the surface here.
Perhaps one of the greatest dangers that now exists is genetically modified (GM) food, or GMO which stands for genetically modified organisms. Some researchers have jokingly referred to food containing GMO as “frankenfoods” and rightly so. Monsanto is responsible for the introduction of GMO and their motive is profit. They are not even concerned about the potential ill effects (what a surprise) and have claimed that:
“Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDA’s job.”
The idea is to patent GMO seeds and make food growers and farmers reliant on Monsanto’s products. As much as ¼ of agricultural land in the US (roughly 70-80 million acres) has already been converted for use in producing genetically modified crops. GM crops do not reproduce, thereby ensuring reliance of the food growers upon the corporations that produce these products. As David Ehrenfield, Professor of biology at Rutgers University has put it:
“Genetic engineering is often justified as a human technology, one that feeds more people with better food. Nothing could be further from the truth. With very few exceptions, the whole point of genetic engineering is to increase sales of chemicals and bio-engineered products to dependent farmers.”
The corruptible FDA does not even require the labeling of GM foods, so more and more altered substances are getting into the food supply. Roughly 60% of food products in the US now contain GMO. The disturbing thing about genetically modified foods is that DNA is inserted into an organism’s genome. Do I even need to mention the effect on human DNA? The companies that manufacture GM foods state that they could help feed the world’s starving people. If you believe that an entity such as Monsanto, (who like DOW, produced Agent Orange) is acting benevolently to help people with substances such as rBGH and GMO, then I’d like to sell you a bridge in Brooklyn, cheap! Monsanto actually requires that farmers that purchase their genetically modified seeds must sign liability waivers.
Studies have shown that pollen from GM corn has killed moths and butterflies, and the recent, massive die-off of honeybees has also been attributed to GM crops. Studies conducted at the Russian Academy of Sciences showed that rats fed genetically modified soy flour suffered stunted growth and death. Farmers in the US and Canada claimed that GM corn had caused their pigs to become sterile and interfere with reproduction. Imagine infants being fed GM food and growing up ingesting it. What would the long term effects be?
A world expert on GM foods by the name of Dr. Arpad Pusztai published over 270 studies on the subject. In a Television documentary in 1998, the doctor reported that laboratory rats fed GM potatoes suffered stunted growth, immune system damage, and damage to organs. 48 hours later his research was confiscated and he was fired from his position at the Rowett Institute in Scotland. His research team was disbanded and he was threatened with legal action.
It has been confirmed, that Pustzai’s firing came from orders that came from Monsanto, then to Bill Clinton and finally to British Prime Minister, Tony Blair’s office. The day after the phone call from Blair’s office, the doctor was fired and had his career destroyed. This is what happens when the truth is told, especially when it steps on the wrong toes.
What is jokingly referred to as science that claims that these horrible poisons are safe, is pushed and funded by the very corporations that manufacture the poison, while independent research is discounted, destroyed or simply ignored. When you’re dealing with mega-billions in profits, nothing is going to be allowed to come forward that would stymie the plans of the conglomerates, even if it includes poisoning people en masse. Agencies such as the FDA and the CDC are obviously corruptible, especially when representatives of the very corporations that push for the approval of certain products are placed into decision making positions of such organizations. Not to mention the endless millions of dollars that are available to buy off members of these agencies.
I wish to make it perfectly clear, that I’m in no way telling people what they should and should not consume. I have a few bad habits myself, and my diet certainly isn’t the healthiest. I love chili dogs. I use tobacco, and enjoy other unhealthy things occasionally. If someone wants to use fluoride or Aspartame, go ahead. Good luck to them. I’m simply passing on information. Everyone should have the right to know about this, and have access to as much information as possible, in order to make the most informed decisions possible. The problem is that these corporations are lying, presenting false research, and deceiving, and that people are ingesting their poisons unknowingly. I also encourage people to not simply accept what I’m saying at face value either. Check out some of the sources listed and do a bit of research to determine if you agree or not. Unfortunately, most will simply discount this type of information (the truth) immediately, with no further investigation of their own.
One thing that the poisons mentioned in this essay (and no doubt countless others) have in common, and that I find alarming, is that they interfere with the DNA. The DNA is sort of like a biological transceiver, and the true controllers of this paradigm seem to be trying to do everything in their power to disrupt its functioning. There has been for quite some time, an agenda to insert people with implantable microchips under the skin, and it has been gaining ground lately, especially since the “war on terror” began in earnest. I wonder how these chips (which already exist, are in mass production, and have won FDA approval) interfere with DNA functioning. People have been and are already being implanted with these tiny transceivers, and the plan is to eventually make them mandatory.
We’re poisoned on the physical level with countless food additives, vaccines, drugs and technology that interferes with our body’s magnetic fields. We’re also poisoned on the emotional, mental and spiritual levels. This is a multilevel operation to diminish human potential, to keep us trapped within our baser instincts, to keep us locked into the physical, to keep us subservient, and to cut us off from the higher aspect of what we all are, the higher consciousness if you like. The amount of toxins in our food supply, in our environment, and in medicines is vast and ever-increasing.
We’re poisoned on the mental level by conditioning into societal paradigms. This begins the moment we begin to learn and develop. We are then pushed through a system that will ensure our continued indoctrination and programming, and so few will ever break free from it. We find ourselves immersed within a war on consciousness.
 Formaldehyde has been shown to cause proteins in the body to irreversibly bind to the DNA. Disruption of human DNA functioning is one of the real agendas behind vaccinations.
 abc news, Feb 22, 2007: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=2890402&page=1
 The Wall Street Journal, April 16, 2007: http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB117668541991270825-lMyQjAxMDE3NzE2NjYxODY1Wj.html
* *Pap Smears are gynecological exams that are instrumental in detecting the first signs of cervical Cancer.
 The Wall Street Journal, April 16, 2007
 Immunization Theory vs. Reality, Neil Z. Miller, New Atlantean Press, 1996.
 Dr. Hadwin documents: http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020119hadwin/020119hadwin.toc.html
 Documentary film: Mercury, Autism and the Global Vaccine Agenda, David Ayoub M.D. Radio Liberty Conference, Aptos California, 2005.
 Federal Register vol. 47, no. 2, 1982.
 Mercury, Autism and the Global Vaccine Agenda
 Article: “Eli Lilly, Zyprexa and the Bush Family,” Bruce Levine, Z Magazine, May, 2004: http://zmagsite.zmag.org/May2004/levine0504.html
 Journalist Jon Rappoport’s No More Fake News: www.nomorefakenews.com
 Chicago Tribune April 18, 2007: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0704170925apr18,1,2244280.story
 The New York Times, March 26, 2005: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/26/national/26shoot.html?ex=1269493200&en=3f84c15a8b8943c4&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt
* *Antidepressants are categorized as SSRI drugs which stands for: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
 The Associated Press, Oct. 22, 2006.
 Mercury, Autism and the Global Vaccine Agenda.
 Immunization Theory vs. Reality, Neil Z. Miller, New Atlantean Press, 1996. pp. 73.
 Ibid pp. 37.
 The New Straits Times: http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/NST/Saturday/NewsBreak/20070512123030/Article/index_html
 From the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs study titled: Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans’ Health? Lessons from the Persian Gulf. Reports of the study can be found at: http://new-atlantean.com/gulfwar.htm
 Pyridostigmine is a drug used to treat muscle fatigue.
* *Hospital patients were injected with toxic levels of radioactive plutonium.
 “Toxicity of Fluorides in Relationship to their Use in Dentistry,” G.J. Cox and H.C. Hodge, Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 40:440.
* *Excitotoxins are substances that damage neurons, bind to receptors, destroy cells and can cause lesions.
 Journal of the American College of Toxicology, vol. 2, number 7, 1983: Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Sodium Lauryl Sulfate: http://www.natural-health-information-centre.com/sls-JACT-report.html
 Argus Publishing, 1997
 The New York Times, 10/25/98